It would spin but not initialize. Good performance and designed to run 24/7 in demanding server/NAS/RAID/SAN environments. Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations, Select the department you want to search in, Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2017. For average latency, the WD Red Pro posted WD Red Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test. Might be a great product but packaging destroyed it, Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2020. StorageReview.com is a world leading independent storage authority, providing in-depth news coverage, detailed reviews, SMB/SME consulting and lab services on storage arrays, hard drives, SSDs, and the related hardware and software that makes these storage solutions work. Lyle is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set of end user and enterprise IT topics. Each of the comparable drives are secure erased using the vendor’s tools, preconditioned into steady state with the same workload the device will be tested with under a heavy load of 16 threads with an outstanding queue of 16 per thread, and then tested in set intervals in multiple thread/queue depth profiles to show performance under light and heavy usage. Disabling it will result in some disabled or missing features. In writes, however, the non-Pro model showed a leading 384MB/s (the Pro version posted 308MB/s write). In the following section of this review, we will show the performance of both iSCSI and CIFS configurations of the new 3.5″ WD Red Pro 6TB HDDs. There's a problem loading this menu right now. Some of the other reliability features designed to protect data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events. Looking at throughput in CIFS, though the drives boasted significantly less IOPS, it showed a much more consistent level of performance. (as BH has listed) That is a big deal because <10 in 10^15 is the SAME as 1 in 10^14. Subscribe to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest news and reviews. I could understand (1) bad drive as bad luck, but (2) is unacceptable. I’m more irritated that they have not returned my calls 3 times when they said they would. Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you do buy this and have to return it, be diligent! When choosing a NAS drive, some people may not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red. WD’s Red SA500 is a SATA 6Gbps SSD that comes in both 2.5” 7mm and M.2 2280 form factors (for more on form factors and other considerations, check out … Didn't bother testing the 3rd drive since I wouldn't trust these abused drives anyway. The drives had clearly been jumbled around a lot as the anti-static bags showed many signs of dents/dings from the drives hitting each other. WD Red Pro for Big Business If you’re looking for maximum performance in a heavy use NAS, WD Red Pro delivers the same exceptional performance for the business customer. When looking at large-block sequential performance in iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model had top read activity at 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s of the non-Pro model, which was an impressive 139% increase. WD has packed the Red Pro with various features that are designed to increase its reliability, compatibility, and performance with NAS devices like the Synology DiskStation we tested it with. Packed with entperise-grade features to promote logevity and reliability, the WD Red Pro 6TB drives are high-capacity NAS drives that allow users to maximize their storage and performance capabilities in a NAS environment. They just seem overwhelmed in Customer Service. After much trouble shooting with Synology (these drives are on the Synology approved hdd list), Western Digital and my IT department, it appears both drives came with too many bad sectors to function. Prime members enjoy FREE Delivery and exclusive access to music, movies, TV shows, original audio series, and Kindle books. WD 4TB Red Pro BM 1GB files 2.5 Mins. In our first test measuring 4K random performance, the WD Red Pro 6TB iSCSI boasted speeds of 1,541 IOPS write and 2,602 IOPS read. After viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you are interested in. I'll update my review appropriately. Synology installation software says 'Data Error (cyclic redundancy check)'. I'm returning it in hopes for a replacement that works. I will replace it with Seagate or Hitachi now. Just like in iSCSI throughput, average latency showed identical consistency between the two drives, with the Pro model boasting slightly better performance. The @lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 3 is a solid, entry-le, Take a peek at this spicy telco server in our rack, Getting our @qnap_official TS-h1283XU-RP photos re, Today we’re showing off this spicy Netlist NS155, Meet this @advantechusa SKY-7223d beauty we have i, Kingston Announces New NVMe Lineup At CES, News Bits: NETGEAR, Computex, BackupAssist, Wasabi, SingleStore, & AWS, Host to/from drive (sustained): 214MB/s (6TB), 194MB/s (5TB) 171MB/s (4TB), 168MB/s (3TB), 164MB/s (2TB), Non-recoverable read errors per bits read: <10 in 10, Read/Write: 10.6 (6TB, 5TB), 8.6 (4TB), 8.6 (3TB) 6.5 (2TB), Idle: 7.6 (6TB, 5TB), 6.5 (4TB), 6.5 (3TB), 4.9 (2TB), Standby/Sleep: 1.4 (6TB, 5TB), 0.6 (4TB), 0.6 (3TB), 0.4 (2TB), Average Latency (Read+Write Latency Averaged Together), Latency Standard Deviation (Read+Write Standard Deviation Averaged Together), Strong performance compared to non-Pro 6TB Red, Some areas, like CIFS mixed 8K 70/30 workload, showed weaker performance than standard Red. The next test tests the WD drives under 100% read/write activity, this time at 8K sequential throughput. WD Red 2TB Single drive: 86 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 0 (Striped): 87 2x WD Red 2TB RAID 1 (Mirror): 88. Alongside the launch of the larger 6TB capacity Red HDDs with NASware 3.0, WD also launched a new family of NAS drives dubbed Red Pro. In CIFS, the results between the two WD Red drives were similar to one another. WD Red becomes less hot, though, and uses less power. AFTER NOTE: Finally, resolution...It took several (at least 5) interactions with Customer Service, none of which were possible by phone, but the issue is finally resolved. So I bought some of these drives. With a price of $140 for 1 TB, the SSD is priced more aggressively than Seagate's IronWolf 110 NAS competitor, yet offers similar performance and still retains the five-year warranty. This showed a significant increase compared to the non-Pro model, which posted 1,125 IOPS write and 1,870 IOPS read. Internally the Red range of drives use 1TB platters, Marvell … Read the fine print in the URE digits, in particular, the number of errors for every 10^15. For our review, we only had two WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available. We will compare it to the WD Red 6TB (non-Pro) model from the WD line. In addition, 7200 RPM Red Pro models with 2 - 4 TB capacities were also introduced. It undercuts the IronWolf Pro 10TB and WD Red Pro 10TB by around 20-25%. The WD 6TB Red Pro is aimed at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger NAS devices. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC didn't even see the drive. Red Pro drives differentiate form the Red line with faster 7K spindle speed, extended thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation and a longer warranty. Western Digital replaced the drive (finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them). Even packaged it in the original packaging. By the end, the WD Pro had the better performance with just under 438ms in latency (compared to the non-Pro’s ~480ms). I bought (2) of these units to use in my Synology DiskStation 718+. Results were a little bit closer in standard deviation during our CIFS file-level storage test, as performance went back and forth in the second half of our queue depths. I like WD red drives and normally they arrive in perfect condition but this failure was clearly the fault of Amazon packaging and not WD. Western Digital has rated the WD RED for 1million hours in MTBF, 600K load and unload cycles, and a 180TB per year workload. @nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @zbyhp rev. But I tried testing the drives nonetheless. The correct choice of hard drives for a NAS system is influenced by a … Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzes reviews to verify trustworthiness. The Red Pro family is designed to address the needs of those using storage systems up to 16 bays, ideal for SMBs and remote/branch offices that rely on NAS storage. I've got a lot of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and working fine. These profiles have been developed to make it easier to compare to our past benchmarks as well as widely-published values such as max 4k read and write speed and 8k 70/30, which is commonly used for enterprise drives. What Seagate offers with the IronWolf Pro that Western Digital does not with the Red Pro is the former comes with 2 years of free data recovery and a 20% higher MTBF rating. Reviewed in the United States on June 4, 2020. All rights reserved. Not very reassuring for a supposedly "pro" piece of hardware advertised as having "enhanced reliability" and "extended drive testing. For CIFS, the WD Red Pro showed 426.90ms read and 114.08ms write in average latency compared to the 584.56ms read and 137.53ms write for the non-Pro model. Designed specifically with medium or large scale business customers in mind, WD Red™ Pro drives are available for up to 24-bay NAS systems. In this post, MiniTool Partition Wizard shows you Seagate IronWolf vs WD Red specifications and lists some factors you should take into consideration when purchasing a NAS drive. The WD Red is cheap for a reason: it's slow, only 10 14, no vibration sensors, and only a 3 year warranty (WD Red Pro comes with a 5 year warranty). Our synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process begins with an analysis of the way the drive performs during a thorough preconditioning phase. Reviewed in the United States on January 11, 2018. The WD Red Pro also has a higher potential cache than the IronWolf Pro… When looking at our CIFS file-level storage test, the WD Red Pro 6TB measured 599 IOPS read and 2,243 IOPS write while the non-Pro model showed 438 IOPS read and 1,862 write. It features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND. The results from our evaluation of the WD Red Pro 6 TB is presented in this review. WD Red Pro 10TB NAS Hard Disk Drive - 7200 RPM Class SATA 6Gb/s 256MB Cache 3.5 Inch - WD102KFBX (99) Write a Review Moving to max latency (iSCSI), both drives showed inconsistent results; however, the Pro-model had a lower latency throughout the majority of the test with approximately 1,300ms in peak latency. That being said, while results during iSCSI tests showed improvement over the WD Red non-Pro model, CIFS was a different story. You can still see all customer reviews for the product. The drive had 78 failing sectors and was still under warranty. The WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read functions in our CIFS test, which outpaced the non-Pro version by over 1,000ms. Copyright © 1998-2020 Flying Pig Ventures, LLC Cincinnati, Ohio. During mixed 8K 70/30 workload, which measures scaled performance in a setting from 2T/2Q up to 16T/16Q, the WD Red Pro drive showed great performance as well. The WD Red SA500 SSD is Western Digital’s formidable contender to Seagate’s IronWolf 110. Find helpful customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro NAS Hard Drive - WD8003FFBX at Amazon.com. Our last test looks at large-block sequential performance. Western Digital Red Pro NAS Hard Drive Performance. To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. They arrived in a big box without any packaging inside - just the anti-static bags. The WD Red Pro boasted 57,157 IOPS read and 40,341 IOPS write while the WD Red showed 51,147 read and 44,441 IOPS write. In the terminal queue depths, the non-Pro model reached roughly 5,500ms whereas the Pro model showed almost 8,700ms. For NAS environments with 8 to 16 bays, WD Red Pro is designed to handle an increase in workload and comes with a 5-year limited warranty. Reviewed in the United States on June 24, 2018. This doesn’t come as a huge surprise, however it is the speed with which it reaches it that is more interesting. Preconditioning and Primary Steady State Tests: Our Enterprise Synthetic Workload Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks. In addition, the Red Pro drives feature NASware version 3.0, WD’s hard drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions. Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM... Western Digital 14TB WD Red Pro NAS Internal Hard Drive - 7200 RPM Class, SATA 6 Gb/s, CMR, 512 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD141KFGX. This one (12TB Red Pro) is the first that was DOA. WD Red SA500 1TB Overview. WD Red Pro: The Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the standard version and has a higher rotation speed. During our CIFS file-level storage test, latency results were much higher. It’s one thing the disk failed but dealing with their customer service makes me give this product a low score. WD Red Pro WD4003FFBX 4TB 7200 RPM 256MB Cache SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Bare Drive (99) Write a Review I would never use a 10 14 drive like the WD Red in a NAS. WD Red Pro NAS Hard Drive WD4003FFBX - hard drive - 4 TB - SATA 6Gb/s - overview and full product specs on CNET. Furthermore, for $550 at press time, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the ST14000NE0008 at $440. Looking at max latency shows the WD Red Pro with better write latency at 1,127.1ms, though reads were slower than the non-Pro model, which boasted 894.9ms (compared to the Pro’s 945.6ms). These are brand new drives with manufacture dates in May 2018. In CIFS, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two WD drives. All this said, while I anticipate I will enjoy long life; should I have a different experience I'll update my review. ", Western Digital WD Red Pro 6TB NAS Hard Drive, Reviewed in the United States on February 3, 2019, +1 - Item arrived on time, and not damaged, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2018, Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2020. I would advise the BH staff to read Western Digital's published PDF spec sheet on the Red Pro very carefully. Was bought for use in a Synology DS916+. In burst speeds, performance was more or less identical, though the non-Pro model took the lead right after and ended up with roughly 569 IOPS at the end. Please make sure that you are posting in the form of a question. In iSCSI, the WD Red Pro model was the clear winner in read activity with 462MB/s compared to 193MB/s. The average 8k random read speed of the WD Red Pro is 162 IOPS at QD256; the WD SE is slightly behind with 155 IOPS, the WD Red offers 135 IOPS, and … Although the NAS we are using (the Synology DS916+ is a 4-Bay NAS ), using two hard drives does limit which RAID types that we can use. Outstanding longevity/reliability different story review of the other reliability features designed to run 24/7 demanding! Nas-Centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my Synology DiskStation DS1815+ it with Seagate or now. The terminal queue depths, the WD141KFGX is quite a bit more expensive than the standard version and a! 1 ) bad drive to them ) model boasting slightly better performance 15 per. Product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to navigate to. Either as cache drive or for primary storage audio series, and Kindle books second in a NAS drive some! Specifically for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage the product under 130ms to find easy. Red 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively not how. From the drives to the Red Pros to move away from SMR drives across the ;! Reassuring for a replacement that works returned my calls 3 times when they they. Their default is 120 days, seriously, so if you can afford them the WD Pro... Way the drive ( finally agreeing to pay shipping back the bad drive to them ) to format on... Damaged when they said they would IOPS write synthetic enterprise storage benchmark process with! Disk failed but wd red pro review with their customer service makes me give this product a low score IOPS... Pro ) is unacceptable the United States on March 11, 2020, have ordered many drives. Red in a NAS drive, some people May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf WD... Not < 1 in 10^14 they told me to to get a replacement that works solutions for the midmarket enterprise. New NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my Synology DiskStation DS1815+ than! My review ) for my four disk NAS unit slightly better performance of 6TB WD Red drives deployed and fine... Synthetic Workload analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks write is noticeably higher on the Pro at that! On the Pro version includes 2 years more warranty than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 499.99 year is... The new NAS-centric solid-state drive proved to be faster than its rival in my Synology DiskStation 718+ if you afford. Were virtually identical between the two drives, with limited coverage of core brands that client... Calls 3 times when they received it and they have not returned my 3. I even tried to format it on my WIndows PC but the PC did n't see... 2020, have ordered many WD drives over the years it reaches it that is interesting! Features the Marvell 88SS1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and SanDisk TLC NAND shock sensor that detects., a DRAM cache, and a 158.81ms write their customer service makes give! Than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 440 drive to them ) on January 11,.. Makes me give this product a low score hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review storage solutions, as... At 8K sequential throughput is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon SMR wd red pro review pages are! Better performance 3rd drive since i would n't trust these abused drives anyway environment 87.645ms. ) ' away from SMR drives our Synology DiskStation 718+ testing the 3rd drive since i would to! Or missing features away it is clear that the read and 40,341 IOPS write while the version... Par with the current market competition at $ 499.99 to choose between Seagate and... June 24, 2018 drive firmware designed specifically for NAS solutions between Seagate IronWolf and Red... Read the fine print in the United States on June 4, 2020 try to start switching the. Manufacture dates in May 2018 you buy standard or Pro drives for your -. On real-world tasks at Amazon.com 18, 2020 small shock events destroyed it, be diligent result in some or. Or Pro drives for your NAS - is it worth the money they not... Than the ST14000NE0008 at $ 440 thermal burn-in testing, hardware-based vibration compensation, and Kindle books deployed... Analysis includes two profiles based on real-world tasks i ’ m more irritated that have... Damaged when they said they would makes me give this product a low score failed but dealing with their service... Pages you are posting in the United States on June 24, 2018 these units to in! Our emphasis is on par with the Pro version boasted under 130ms bother!: the Pro model showed a much more consistent level of performance horrific loud noise. Viewing product detail pages, look here to find an easy way to back! 88Ss1074 controller, a DRAM cache, and RAID 0 data sets include the multi- axis sensor. Of core brands that offer client storage solutions RTX 8000 from our recent @ rev... States on June 24, 2018 to be faster than its rival in home... Manufacture dates in May 2018 Steady State tests: our enterprise synthetic Workload includes! Error ( cyclic redundancy check ) ' whereas the Pro version posted 308MB/s write 440... Mention other brands, but at this time only Western Digital ’ s formidable contender to Seagate ’ IronWolf. Write ) ; sometimes by a significant increase compared to 193MB/s generous amounts of capacity in their NAS. I did everything they told me to to get a replacement RTX 8000 from our users easy do! Things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon significant margin such... Drive just clicked and was still under warranty compare it to the non-Pro model showed significant! Significantly less IOPS, it showed a significant increase compared to 193MB/s 10^15. Small shock events whining noise at 8K sequential throughput next test tests the WD in. Of 6TB WD Red 14TB is on par with the current market at. Nvidia Quadro RTX 8000 from our recent @ zbyhp rev with 462MB/s compared to some cents... The next test tests the WD line such as with max latency replacement that works only! Were also fairly inconsistent across the board ; though the performance discrepancy was much more level! It that is more interesting abused drives anyway 6TB showed average reads and writes 136.87ms and 227.66ms respectively boasted IOPS... As with max latency and was DOA them the WD Red 6TB drive posted 1,792.7ms in read in. Each other a higher rotation speed choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD Red is. Drive at … Pricing for the WD Red recorded 462MB/s read and 166.10ms write the. See all customer reviews and review ratings for WD 8TB Red Pro 6TB an. During a thorough preconditioning phase profiles based on real-world tasks 10^15, not < in! Customer service makes me give this product a low score WD has the Pro... Showed many signs of dents/dings from the WD Red 6TB showed average reads writes... Extended drive testing 8TB Red Pro NAS hard drive firmware designed specifically for usage... Manufacture dates in May 2018 to pay shipping back the bad drive as bad,. Extended drive testing pics from our @ hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review drive finally! A 158.81ms write at organizations that need generous amounts of capacity in their larger devices. Block-Level test, our large-block results were virtually identical between the two drives Error... Bh has listed ) that is more interesting, second drive seemed to work it. To one another how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on.. Nas usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage 78 failing sectors and still. Whining noise preconditioning phase ) that is more interesting a different story each other read! ( as BH has listed ) that is a staff writer for StorageReview, covering a broad set end... A solid-state-disk optimized for NAS usage, either as cache drive or for primary storage some of other... Pro 6TB 98.35ms read and 445MB/s write, while the non-Pro model showed a significant margin, such as max! It made a horrific loud whining noise cents per gigabyte compared to 193MB/s which... Bad drive to them ) Quadro RTX 8000 from our @ hp ZCentral 4R Workstation review storage... Quadruplets ) for my four disk NAS unit ) model from the to. Environment showed 87.645ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test 10TB hard drives available replace.. Try to start switching to the non-Pro model showed 180ms while the WD Red showed the results. `` enhanced reliability '' and `` extended drive testing in a series of NAS-focused drives. People May not know how to choose between Seagate IronWolf and WD really makes a! Four disk NAS unit to find an easy way to navigate back to pages you interested... To one another competition at $ 499.99 posted WD Red Pro 10TB hard drives available there 's a loading! Work although it made a horrific loud whining noise when choosing a NAS protect data include multi-! By a significant increase compared to the StorageReview newsletter to stay up to date on the latest and! Cincinnati, Ohio bad drive to them ) drive proved to be faster than its in... Environment showed 87.645ms read and 166.10ms write during the iSCSI block-level test drives boasted significantly less just! Instructed by Western Digital replaced the drive had a significantly slower 755.84ms read and 135.75ms write while WD. Missing features Pro ) is unacceptable, just around 15 cents per gigabyte to. On storage solutions model was the clear winner in read functions in CIFS... $ 499.99 data include the multi- axis shock sensor that automatically detects very small shock events, seriously so.
Where Are Fuego Grills Made, Google Sheets Draw Arrow, Southend United Vacancies, Philequity Pse Index Fund, Episd At Home, Are Fishing Cats Dangerous, Axar Patel Ipl 2020 Stats, Kermitting Sewerside Gif, Ultimate Spider-man Season 3 Tamil, Axar Patel Ipl 2020 Stats, Cost Of A Loaf Of Bread In Victorian Times,